The buffalo HP-G54 has always been considered to be a stable router that has a built in amp so it has good signal strength. _________________ I fix "shortcuts". If you don't have time to read thoroughly, I don't have time to re-type what you missed.
FWIW I did pick up a pair of N12's and they've been running for almost 7 hours now, so it looks like wireless dropping isn't an issue (fingers crossed). Applying a WPA2/AES key was a pain point though because sometimes applying the key would only result in a 1 way connection but applying it a second time would succeed. Not sure what's up with that, but it isn't a show stopper (just a time waster! ).
Thanks for the input, even if I didn't end up using the 615 suggestion . Still felt a little gun shy about it but really it was due to the N12's being at a more convenient store locally. I would try the 615's again next if I had to.
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 20:38 Post subject:
Alot of this depends on exactly what you are wanting to do, if you just want to do simple linking with not many bells and whistles then that whr-hp-g300n will do fine.
The thing to keep in mind with it is that its a 4MB atheros unit, which is somewhat different than say a 4MB broadcom based unit because there is no flavor variation of builds that come out for it, so its very pre-baked. Like 4MB atheros builds, atleast the one i have (which is the whr-hp-g300n), wont have openVPN and/or certain services you may want to use. But that sacrifice is made up in raw radio power. So there is alot of trivial factors involved.
If you want a great range unit, like Peabody said, and i have to totally agree, the buffalo whr-hp-g54 is still my best range unit, with not a shitload of features. I have to many units to count, but as far as my tests were concerened, check for yourselves.
Matter of fact i just got a D-Link DIR 825 that i have not even broke out of the shrink wrap yet, just haven't had time, and not to mention my stuggle to become the "laziest man in L.A. County" doesn't allow for such activity to often. _________________ Wireless N Config | Linking Routers | DD-WRT Wiki | DD-WRT Builds | Peacock - Broadcom FAQ
Buddee, thank you for that reply with links to actual test results and review of the WZR-HP-G300NH. With all that info, I think I have made up my mind. For the client router, I m going to go with a WZR-HP-G300NH. I am still leaning toward a e4200 for the in-RV network AP.
Some may ask why 2 routers (why not just 1 in repeater mode). Two reasons: (1) I need access to the VLAN network even when no network available to repeat (this is possible in broadcom only). (2) I have had issues when repeating some WPA2 networks. Every day at 9 AM the primary (wpa2) network would do some kind of housecleaning and result wireless client connections being disconnected and not being able to re-connect (WLAN keeps refusing connection). Wired client connections were OK. I would have to reboot the router to clear this condition. This condition was consitent with both WRT54G (builds 12533, 13594, 15943) and e2000 (build 14929). Using dedicated client mode and AP mode devices would clear this condition.
Now if I can locate a refurbished WZR-HP-G300NH! _________________ WRT54G V1.0, build 14853 VINT mini_USB_FTP, USB mod, pixelserv
Buffalo WZR-HP-AG300H build 17461, pixelserve
Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH, OpenWrt (trunk build 29606), ath9k drivers, pixelserv
Ubiquiti Bullet M2, AirOS
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 23:15 Post subject:
Well here is another tittybit, The WZR-HP-G300NH is a great unit, Its my main AP and runs in AP mode of course. But in my testing of using it in a repeater style setting
Atheros units are different in respects that different modes will reflect to the antenna chains and Txpower. Like say i wanted to run the WZR-HP-G300NH in atheros' repeater mode (client mode with VAPs) the WZR is a 3x3 MIMO unit, with its antenna chain setting to 1+3 | 1+2+3 with a default dBm of 20 in AP mode (AFAIK the highest dBm i have seen in AP with the buff is 23) and i wanted to repeat a G router (any signal/model should work, does for me anyhow) You would have to set the WZR to client mode | G-only mode and if you were going to create VAPs for wireless clients on your end to connect with, you would need to switch up the chains to 1+3 | 1+3 since G doesn't use a 3 antenna setup, and this will affect your Txpower, in my testing with it, the Txpower was lowered to 19dBm. Otherwise if you left it default 1+3 | 1+2+3 then the VAP clients on your end won't be able to connect, atleast mine couldn't, it would connect for a split second and then anytime i tried to do any network activity, it would cut the connection.
And yes i know, alot of digital jazz there, but its what i have learned with it.
I still recommend the whr-hp-g54 for any style repeater setups, as its the best all around performer/features for doing that. It has VLANs as you know and still of all my units here, has the best range. The WZR-HP-G300NH is better served as a main AP IMHO, it does well as a repeater to, but as i stated in the jazz above, certain modes will cut Txpower because of how Atheros chain settings work. _________________ Wireless N Config | Linking Routers | DD-WRT Wiki | DD-WRT Builds | Peacock - Broadcom FAQ
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 0:20 Post subject: Re: wrt400n vs rt-n16 or others?
claes wrote:
Hi! First post just looking for some advice. I am primarily interested in the asus rt-n16 and the linksys wrt400n. From what I've read people have been having flaky performance with their rt-n16s, overheating and slow connection speeds, but I can't find any real reviews of dd-wrt on the wrt400n. Has anyone had experience with either of these routers and care to share?
My primary concerns are performance and stability. I am poor, so something that won't overheat on me would be nice. I've got a gigabit switch laying around so that's no real loss with the wrt400n. Primarily g clients but will be upgrading soon, few GB clients including a nas running many torrents (private trackers though - few connections) and serving media to an htpc.
Seems like the Asus has the ram and memory but on smallnetbuilder and the like the wrt400n seems to outperform it.
Also considering the buffalo wzr-hp-g300nh but have seen inconsistent reviews and it's ugly... but if the shoe fits?
second time around! looking at wrt400n and e3000, even if I buy a brand new gigabit switch the 400n is about $30 cheaper... any comparisons/thoughts/recommendations at all on these routers running dd-wrt or tomato with the e3000 would be extremely helpful! really - which one is more stable/faster/better?
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:50 Post subject:
Of those options you are listing in your choices, the E3000 probably would be best for you. And yes i use a WZR-HP-G300NH, pair of them actually, and they work great for me, but like you i have read of many complaints with it. I don't have these "issues" with any of my WZR's and i been using them since xmas and have pretty much let one of them be my main Gateway/AP. Only thing i feel it lacks is port based VLANs.
The WRT400N is a fairly good choice, but from the ones you listed, the E3000 would probably do you best. The RT-N16 is a great choice to, mine does very well, its performance for me is about parallel with my E3000, cept the E3000 has 2 radios and the RT-N16 only has 1. _________________ Wireless N Config | Linking Routers | DD-WRT Wiki | DD-WRT Builds | Peacock - Broadcom FAQ
Currently using 16214. Seems to work fine for me, so much that i bought a pair and put one of them up at my work for me and my fellow workers to use, my co-workers love it and have considered purchasing one as well, but most of them up there don't know much about wireless routers, so they just use whatever.
Thanks for the reply, Buddee. Is the 16214 the DD-WRT one, or is it the Buffalo branded DD-WRT? Right now I actually have the Buffalo whr-hp-g54 running Tomato. It's rock solid but I wanted to upgrade to N for purposes of streaming to my bluray player. I also had the Buffalo wireless ethernet converter, G speed. But when it died, Buffalo was nice enough to upgrade me to their N one, the wli-tx4-G300N. So I thought getting the wzr-hp-g300nh would be good. I've also thought of waiting until the release of their new dual band router, but not sure the 5 Ghz band is worth the extra cost. My cordless phones run on 5.8 Ghz so not sure if that would conflict or not.
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 19:28 Post subject:
mp4 wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Buddee. Is the 16214 the DD-WRT one, or is it the Buffalo branded DD-WRT? Right now I actually have the Buffalo whr-hp-g54 running Tomato. It's rock solid but I wanted to upgrade to N for purposes of streaming to my bluray player. I also had the Buffalo wireless ethernet converter, G speed. But when it died, Buffalo was nice enough to upgrade me to their N one, the wli-tx4-G300N. So I thought getting the wzr-hp-g300nh would be good. I've also thought of waiting until the release of their new dual band router, but not sure the 5 Ghz band is worth the extra cost. My cordless phones run on 5.8 Ghz so not sure if that would conflict or not.
I use the community builds of dd-wrt for the WZR, i tried the buffalo 14998 dd-wrt build, both worked fine for me. There is a link in the wiki for the WZR un-encrpyted reversion file should you need to revert back to buffalo (and buffalo dd-wrt) firmware, but word of warning if you do use the file is give it plenty of time, it takes almost 12 minutes if not longer for it to fully revert back using the un-encrypted firmware, but its the easiest way.
For this unit it works like this, any of the buffalo firmwares, even the buff dd-wrt build, are interchangeable, you can flash from one to another, but once you flash this unit with the community dd-wrt build, you can only upgrade/downgrade using the community builds, if you try to revert back with the buffalo firmware or the buff dd-wrt build, it will fail. To revert back, you have to use the un-encrypted file linked in the wiki, or use the tftp method, which is listed in the same wiki for de-bricking procedures. _________________ Wireless N Config | Linking Routers | DD-WRT Wiki | DD-WRT Builds | Peacock - Broadcom FAQ
Of those options you are listing in your choices, the E3000 probably would be best for you. And yes i use a WZR-HP-G300NH, pair of them actually, and they work great for me, but like you i have read of many complaints with it. I don't have these "issues" with any of my WZR's and i been using them since xmas and have pretty much let one of them be my main Gateway/AP. Only thing i feel it lacks is port based VLANs.
The WRT400N is a fairly good choice, but from the ones you listed, the E3000 would probably do you best. The RT-N16 is a great choice to, mine does very well, its performance for me is about parallel with my E3000, cept the E3000 has 2 radios and the RT-N16 only has 1.
I apologize for my neurotic curiosity, but why the e3000 over the wrt400n? Do you think I could get a pro/con between the two (or even the asus and buffalo as well)? Seems like you are lucky enough to have owned most of these units
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:42 Post subject:
The E3000 over the WRT400N on my preference to gigabit switches.
For my opinion break down would be like this..
RT-N16 - Great all around performer, plenty of ROM/RAM, plenty of features.
WZR-HP-G300NH - Another great performer, but Atheros based so most of the dd-wrt infos will be somewhat different in application for it, also no port based VLANs support.
E3000 - Probably the best N broadcom unit i have out of the bunch, has gigabit/usb/dual band/radios N, only one setback i think with this unit was linksys's shitty choice of design, this also gets the hottest out of all my units. And the case design doesn't help disperse heat very well. But i have since modded it by cutting an opening in the front face plate, now heat is not problem ;)
WRT400N - Great unit with good radio strength, dual radios/dual band N as well, but no USB (not to big a deal because i don't use the USB much anyways on routers), and 10/100 ports, no port base VLANs as well, i would like to say it would be a good straight forward unit for not doing many complex setups with.
That's very helpful - a little discouraging about the e3000 heat issue, though. Why the strong gigabit preference - isn't the only slowdown in wired to wireless? I might prefer the wrt400n if my only loss is heat (very simple network here) as I'll save $35 even after buying a new GbE switch...
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:31 Post subject: Best Routers for DD-WRT within a Buisness
Hi All,
We previously used to purchase the Buffalo WHR-HP-G55DD which was preconfigured with the DD-WRT firmware,
This model is being made obsolete i am just looking for some recommendations for some decent wireless units that are being used for mainly wireless,
i am looking for factors such as easy to install (we will be doing several a day) and also good wireless strength and reliable using the dd-wrt firmware