best bulid

Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware
Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
][No_WaY
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:59    Post subject: best bulid Reply with quote
what is the best bulid including 18777 and prior to it as all bulid post 18777 is to big for my eap3660

with greetings
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
Sponsor
KrypteX
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 18 Jan 2014
Posts: 2411
PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 9:11    Post subject: Reply with quote
18777 is the last best build that you can use on that router. I've reopened the concerned ticket several times http://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/4015 , but BrainSlayer won't fix it, unfortunately.
_________________
THERE ARE NO STRANGERS HERE; ONLY FRIENDS YOU HAVEN'T YET MET.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
DD-WRT CHANGELOG | DEVICES | DD-WRT BUILDS | KONG BUILDS | UNOFFICIAL BUILDS | DD-WRT in VIRTUALBOX
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
][No_WaY
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
PostPosted: Fri Apr 17, 2015 23:36    Post subject: Reply with quote
KrypteX wrote:
18777 is the last best build that you can use on that router. I've reopened the concerned ticket several times http://svn.dd-wrt.com/ticket/4015 , but BrainSlayer won't fix it, unfortunately.


thank you sir , you r the only one who replay in timely manner and very helpful.

but what I mean can you advise which build is best for eap3660:-
13064
or
14986
or
18777
or other?
I know 18777 is the latest but is it the best to use?

I hope BB find a time to fix it for eap3660
and found a way for eap9550 and eap350

with greetings
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:30    Post subject: Reply with quote
they are all buggy..but 18777 is the best up to it, i remember using it on my wndr3700 v1 & dir-825 b1 it was noticeably better than priors. been using ddwrt since r136xx i think it was when i started, & every single build between that & current, the nasty "WAN RX hang" & qos memory leaks were the biggest offenders in early builds
_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55797 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55797 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

Back to top View user's profile Send private message
KrypteX
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 18 Jan 2014
Posts: 2411
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 5:00    Post subject: Reply with quote
@ ][No_Way
See, I'm not the only one who replies in a timely manner and is very helpful ! Wink
_________________
THERE ARE NO STRANGERS HERE; ONLY FRIENDS YOU HAVEN'T YET MET.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
DD-WRT CHANGELOG | DEVICES | DD-WRT BUILDS | KONG BUILDS | UNOFFICIAL BUILDS | DD-WRT in VIRTUALBOX
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
][No_WaY
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 9:23    Post subject: Reply with quote
tatsuya46 wrote:
they are all buggy..but 18777 is the best up to it, i remember using it on my wndr3700 v1 & dir-825 b1 it was noticeably better than priors. been using ddwrt since r136xx i think it was when i started, & every single build between that & current, the nasty "WAN RX hang" & qos memory leaks were the biggest offenders in early builds


thank you dear.
Im also old user but not advanced starting from my wrt54gs v2 on 2008 Smile

just for intrest which is the best build for your opinon regardless it fit my EAP3660 or not.

with greetings
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
][No_WaY
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 9:27    Post subject: Reply with quote
KrypteX wrote:
@ ][No_Way
See, I'm not the only one who replies in a timely manner and is very helpful ! Wink


you r right , tatsuya46 is one of the active interesting Guru and you are the one who start the changelog.

I hope you both best luck.

Last edited by ][No_WaY on Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:46; edited 1 time in total
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada
PostPosted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 19:12    Post subject: Reply with quote
kryptex posted the changelog
_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55797 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55797 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

Back to top View user's profile Send private message
][No_WaY
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 3:40    Post subject: Reply with quote
tatsuya46 wrote:
kryptex posted the changelog


sorry I looks m confused Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed

still I didn't get your opinion for best build in general Very Happy
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
tatsuya46
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 03 Jan 2010
Posts: 7568
Location: YWG, Canada
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:30    Post subject: Reply with quote
][No_WaY wrote:
still I didn't get your opinion for best build in general Very Happy



tatsuya46 wrote:
but 18777 is the best up to it, i remember using it on my wndr3700 v1 & dir-825 b1 it was noticeably better than priors.

_________________
LATEST FIRMWARE(S)

BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers

[x86_64] Haswell i3-4150/QCA9984/QCA9882 ------> r55797 std
[QUALCOMM] DIR-862L --------------------------------> r55797 std
▲ ACTIVE / INACTIVE ▼
[QUALCOMM] WNDR4300 v1 --------------------------> r50485 std
[BROADCOM] DIR-860L A1 ----------------------------> r50485 std


Sigh.. why do i exist anyway.. | I love you Anthony.. never forget that.. my other 99% that ill never see again..

Back to top View user's profile Send private message
KrypteX
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 18 Jan 2014
Posts: 2411
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 5:40    Post subject: Reply with quote
@][No_Way Indeed you ARE confused. Be more attentive next time. Also, check your Inbox, you have a message from me since yesterday. Haven't you noticed ?
_________________
THERE ARE NO STRANGERS HERE; ONLY FRIENDS YOU HAVEN'T YET MET.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
DD-WRT CHANGELOG | DEVICES | DD-WRT BUILDS | KONG BUILDS | UNOFFICIAL BUILDS | DD-WRT in VIRTUALBOX
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
][No_WaY
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:45    Post subject: Reply with quote
tatsuya46 wrote:
][No_WaY wrote:
still I didn't get your opinion for best build in general Very Happy



tatsuya46 wrote:
but 18777 is the best up to it, i remember using it on my wndr3700 v1 & dir-825 b1 it was noticeably better than priors.



][No_WaY wrote:
just for intrest which is the best build for your opinon regardless it fit my EAP3660 or not.


that what I mean best build in general from your experience not for eap3660

I know I locked with 18777
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
][No_WaY
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
PostPosted: Sun Apr 19, 2015 6:48    Post subject: Reply with quote
KrypteX wrote:
@][No_Way Indeed you ARE confused. Be more attentive next time. Also, check your Inbox, you have a message from me since yesterday. Haven't you noticed ?


so you can see what I mean Smile

and for your message: noted and changed.
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
][No_WaY
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2015 9:24    Post subject: Reply with quote
I need help,

Now I'm using b18777 but i have 2 problem
first: router reboot some time once a day and some time much more frequent, this looks with high cpu consuming
2nd:
I have eap3660 with build 1877
and I made 3 ssid and separate it so I want to restrict address on br1 with ip 192.168.2.x Br1
based on ip range and deny access for specific time.
my firewall iptables:-
iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o br0 -j SNAT --to `nvram get lan_ipaddr`
iptables -I FORWARD -i br1 -d `nvram get lan_ipaddr`/`nvram get lan_netmask` -m state --state NEW -j DROP
iptables -I FORWARD -i br2 -d `nvram get lan_ipaddr`/`nvram get lan_netmask` -m state --state NEW -j DROP
iptables -I INPUT -i br1 -p tcp --dport telnet -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
iptables -I INPUT -i br2 -p tcp --dport telnet -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
iptables -I INPUT -i br1 -p tcp --dport ssh -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
iptables -I INPUT -i br2 -p tcp --dport ssh -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
iptables -I INPUT -i br1 -p tcp --dport www -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
iptables -I INPUT -i br2 -p tcp --dport www -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
iptables -I INPUT -i br1 -p tcp --dport https -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
iptables -I INPUT -i br2 -p tcp --dport https -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -i br1 -s 192.168.2.1/24 -p udp --dport 53 -j DNAT --to 208.67.222.222
iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -i br1 -s 192.168.2.1/24 -p tcp --dport 53 -j DNAT --to 208.67.222.222
iptables -D FORWARD -j lan2wan
iptables -I FORWARD -j lan2wan
insmod xt_mark
insmod xt_mac
insmod imq
insmod ipt_IMQ
tc qdisc del dev br2 root
tc qdisc add dev br2 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev br2 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 2048kbit
tc qdisc add dev br2 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev br2 parent 1:0 prio 5 protocol ip u32 match ip dst 192.168.3.0/24 flowid 1:1
ip link set imq0 up
tc qdisc del dev imq0 root
tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb
tc class add dev imq0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbit
tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 prio 5 protocol ip u32 match ip src 192.168.3.0/24 flowid 1:1
iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -i br1 -j IMQ --todev 0
ip link set imq0 up

and iptables -vnL :-
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 42637 packets, 2827K bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 REJECT tcp -- br2 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:443 reject-with tcp-reset
0 0 REJECT tcp -- br1 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:443 reject-with tcp-reset
0 0 REJECT tcp -- br2 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80 reject-with tcp-reset
0 0 REJECT tcp -- br1 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80 reject-with tcp-reset
0 0 REJECT tcp -- br2 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:22 reject-with tcp-reset
0 0 REJECT tcp -- br1 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:22 reject-with tcp-reset
0 0 REJECT tcp -- br2 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:23 reject-with tcp-reset
0 0 REJECT tcp -- br1 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:23 reject-with tcp-reset
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 15722 packets, 6752K bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
15722 6752K lan2wan 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
0 0 DROP 0 -- br2 * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 state NEW
0 0 DROP 0 -- br1 * 0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.0/24 state NEW
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 13480 packets, 4202K bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_1 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_10 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_2 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_3 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_4 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_5 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_6 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_7 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_8 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain advgrp_9 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_1 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_10 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_2 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_3 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_4 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_5 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_6 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_7 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_8 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain grp_9 (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain lan2wan (1 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain logaccept (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 ACCEPT 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
Chain logbrute (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 recent: SET name: BRUTEFORCE side: source
0 0 RETURN 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 !recent: UPDATE seconds: 60 hit_count: 4 name: BRUTEFORCE side: source
0 0 RETURN 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 1/min burst 1
0 0 DROP 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
Chain logdrop (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 DROP 0 -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
Chain logreject (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 REJECT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with tcp-reset
Chain trigger_out (0 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination


so can you help me to fix it?

with greetings
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
][No_WaY
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 9:26    Post subject: Reply with quote
any body can help?
Back to top View user's profile Send private message
Goto page 1, 2  Next Display posts from previous:    Page 1 of 2
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum