Your reports for Qualcomm/Atheros units are greatly appreciated !
This build thread is for reporting successes and problem with loading this experimental test build. This is important info for developers and users. Always state your hardware and SPECIFIC build. Do not ask questions about your specific router or how to configure it in this thread; create your own thread to discuss any specific problems you have or need resolved. Please also do not respond to such questions. This thread is to report info, not to seek it. Posts that do not add to understanding this build will be deleted. Make sure you know how to flash properly and the risk before using this build. It is important to adhere to these requirements, to keep this thread from becoming impossibly long and useless. If you don't know what build to flash and how to flash properly and have a means of recovery if things should go wrong, do NOT flash this experimental test build. _________________ THERE ARE NO STRANGERS HERE; ONLY FRIENDS YOU HAVEN'T YET MET.
DD-WRT CHANGELOG | DEVICES | DD-WRT BUILDS | KONG BUILDS | UNOFFICIAL BUILDS | DD-WRT in VIRTUALBOX
Joined: 28 Jun 2011 Posts: 413 Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 15:33 Post subject:
Router: TP-Link TL-WR842ND v2
Kernel: 3.10.104 #3552
Web upgrade from previous public beta _________________ [Atheros] TP-Link TL-WR842ND v2 rev 30805 std (VPN and PPTP server, AD blocking, YAMon3.1)
[Atheros] TP-Link TL-WR740N v3 rev 29396 std (AD blocking)
[Ralink] Asus rt-n10plus C1 rev 30805 std (AP with NAT, QoS, AD blocking)
Why no kernel update to 3.18.44 which been released 2016-10-22?
You would have to ask BS that
EA8500 been stuck on exactly same
Linux 3.18.42 #108 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 14 01:03:03 CEST 2016 armv7l
w/ 30771, 30796, 30805
Kong's latest for EA8500 --
DD-WRT v3.0-r30800M kongat (10/27/16)
Linux 3.18.42 #231 SMP PREEMPT Thu Oct 27 22:57:22 CEST 2016 armv7l
BTW ---- 30805 has been up 4:35 after I deleted all in Services Priority in QOS.
nDPI is a killer of things I love.... Might work under HFSC ... doubtful, but haven't tried yet, just always used HTB FQ_Codel