BrainSlayer is the best, I have been using DD-WRT on my WRT54GS for almost a decade now and I can say there is nothing out there that comes even close! That's why it was a no brainer to donate for the sample router.
I just hope that the hardware NAT will be supported. When I deactivate the HW NAT the throughput really drops. HW NAT was my main reason to buy this thing...
Joined: 06 Jun 2006 Posts: 7492 Location: Dresden, Germany
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 23:08 Post subject:
unfortunatly not. uboot recovery is the only way. any you must type "tpl" very fast at uboot startup to enter the console. otherwise any access is blocked _________________ "So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 0:29 Post subject:
Cobra1582 wrote:
checho wrote:
Cobra1582 wrote:
what do they mean "donated board needed for port"
It means that you don't read before you post.
what have I missed, as far as I understood a device was sent to him so would he not have the boards?
One "board" yes, he has the WDR4300, thus the test build for the WDR4300 within this thread... When the official support build comes out with reports of non-bricks (being that the first test build caused bricks and was removed), the status of the wiki may change, until then.. doubtful, which is what is meant by:
Please some moderator lock this topic. It was only for the means of fundraising and sending a device to developers. Start another topic for support questions.
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 19:53 Post subject:
checho wrote:
Please some moderator lock this topic. It was only for the means of fundraising and sending a device to developers. Start another topic for support questions.
How about you start another thread for the WDR4300 support? Also, make sure to post the working build from within this thread into the new thread, you do that - and i'll lock this thread, till then, it'll remain open. Shoot me a pm if you do decide to do this. _________________ Wireless N Config | Linking Routers | DD-WRT Wiki | DD-WRT Builds | Peacock - Broadcom FAQ
Joined: 06 Jun 2006 Posts: 7492 Location: Dresden, Germany
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:34 Post subject:
cookie_lu wrote:
Just a note to say model 'WDR4300' is not identical to 'WDR4310', as indicated in Open-wrt forum--in case some tried and it bricked the router.
this message is useless unless you say whats different inbetween these both models _________________ "So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
Just a note to say model 'WDR4300' is not identical to 'WDR4310', as indicated in Open-wrt forum--in case some tried and it bricked the router.
this message is useless unless you say whats different inbetween these both models
4310 is for the domestic Chinese market, 4300 is for their export markets.
The only difference between them is the header router identifier number so you can easily add 4310 for dd-wrt support.
Trying to load a dd-wrt 4300 build onto a 4310 will not brick it, the tp-link firmware will just reject the update. _________________ Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
Joined: 06 Jun 2006 Posts: 7492 Location: Dresden, Germany
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:42 Post subject:
and how is the header identifier? i cannot find a original fw file _________________ "So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
