Umm, Im waiting for european CFE. Please, tell us if you found it. Should be "easy" on the CFE colector thread _________________ My Blog
wrt54GL 1.1 -> Resurrected eko 14471/MMC Mod
E2000 (wrt320n converted) 1.0 -> BS 15962M -> Resurrected WAN<Serial> BS r23919
RT-AC56U -> Merlin 374.42_2
Umm, Im waiting for european CFE. Please, tell us if you found it. Should be "easy" on the CFE colector thread
You and me both...
From what i am beginning to see, EU users i have spoken with say they don't even have the E~ series linksys in their countries...This being said you could possibly have a long wait.
They'll appear in Europe eventually when Cisco has cleared their old stock. _________________ Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
Joined: 26 Jul 2009 Posts: 126 Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 19:53 Post subject:
buddee wrote:
h4x0r wrote:
So does this convert the router to simultaneous dual band n? or do you still have to choose between 2.4 and 5 GHz?
Still have to choose 2.4 or 5, this unit does not have dual radios.
So what's the point? why does it matter if it says E2000 on the router info page instead of WRT320N? Why not just load firmware onto the stock WRT320N?
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 20:00 Post subject:
h4x0r wrote:
So what's the point? why does it matter if it says E2000 on the router info page instead of WRT320N? Why not just load firmware onto the stock WRT320N?
Joined: 03 May 2010 Posts: 74 Location: Eastford, CT
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 21:13 Post subject:
buddee wrote:
h4x0r wrote:
So what's the point? why does it matter if it says E2000 on the router info page instead of WRT320N? Why not just load firmware onto the stock WRT320N?
With the E2000 you have more NVRAM space. Also what is the point of comments like this? If you don't want to do it and see no point in this, then this post does not concern you.
Hey buddee, can you go over what more NVRAM space would mean...better performance? Bigger Builds available?
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 7401 Location: Little Rock
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 23:33 Post subject:
fallout330 wrote:
Hey buddee, can you go over what more NVRAM space would mean...better performance? Bigger Builds available?
Respectfully asked and thanks!
No probs fallout~
It would be good if you ran like say big firewall scripts that eat up some NVRAM space, and really to be honest, since i did this, the router itself seems to run smoother.
Not sure if its the process of expanding the NVRAM or just the newer dd-wrt builds or what. If you don't use this (big scripts etc) though, im not certain that you would need this.
Joined: 03 May 2010 Posts: 74 Location: Eastford, CT
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 23:35 Post subject:
buddee wrote:
fallout330 wrote:
Hey buddee, can you go over what more NVRAM space would mean...better performance? Bigger Builds available?
Respectfully asked and thanks!
No probs fallout~
It would be good if you ran like say big firewall scripts that eat up some NVRAM space, and really to be honest, since i did this, the router itself seems to run smoother.
Not sure if its the process of expanding the NVRAM or just the newer dd-wrt builds or what. If you don't use this (big scripts etc) though, im not certain that you would need this.
Probably a little more than what I would need for the moment. Good to know the option is there if needed. Thanks for the reply! _________________ x1 Linksys E2000 w/x2 6dbi Antennas[DD-WRT v24-sp2 (04/13/11) std-usb-nas-build 16785] x1 Linksys E4200 [DD-WRT.v24-17201_NEWD-2_K2.6_big-nv60k (06/14/11)]
Joined: 26 Jan 2008 Posts: 13049 Location: Behind The Reset Button
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 0:28 Post subject:
buddee wrote:
fallout330 wrote:
Hey buddee, can you go over what more NVRAM space would mean...better performance? Bigger Builds available?
Respectfully asked and thanks!
No probs fallout~
It would be good if you ran like say big firewall scripts that eat up some NVRAM space, and really to be honest, since i did this, the router itself seems to run smoother.
Not sure if its the process of expanding the NVRAM or just the newer dd-wrt builds or what. If you don't use this (big scripts etc) though, im not certain that you would need this.
Edit: also it does not add bigger builds, as the wrt320n already has an 8Mb flash, so it can already run the biggest build.
don't forget Linksys fixed the reset button in the cfe. The reset button now works. Also, your router is running better / smoother cuz I am sure linksys also fixed some cfe bugs in the 320 when they changed them to 2000's. _________________ [Moderator Deleted]
Joined: 03 May 2010 Posts: 74 Location: Eastford, CT
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 0:36 Post subject:
barryware wrote:
buddee wrote:
fallout330 wrote:
Hey buddee, can you go over what more NVRAM space would mean...better performance? Bigger Builds available?
Respectfully asked and thanks!
No probs fallout~
It would be good if you ran like say big firewall scripts that eat up some NVRAM space, and really to be honest, since i did this, the router itself seems to run smoother.
Not sure if its the process of expanding the NVRAM or just the newer dd-wrt builds or what. If you don't use this (big scripts etc) though, im not certain that you would need this.
Edit: also it does not add bigger builds, as the wrt320n already has an 8Mb flash, so it can already run the biggest build.
don't forget Linksys fixed the reset button in the cfe. The reset button now works. Also, your router is running better / smoother cuz I am sure linksys also fixed some cfe bugs in the 320 when they changed them to 2000's.
Very good barryware....it might be worth the upgrade then, thanks! _________________ x1 Linksys E2000 w/x2 6dbi Antennas[DD-WRT v24-sp2 (04/13/11) std-usb-nas-build 16785] x1 Linksys E4200 [DD-WRT.v24-17201_NEWD-2_K2.6_big-nv60k (06/14/11)]