Ok, thanks BS, will try other driver of ipw2200? But i'm wondering because on all v.23 and the older v.24 (03/02/2006). ipw2200 works fine, why not the newer v.24 ?
Joined: 06 Jun 2006 Posts: 7463 Location: Dresden, Germany
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 17:28 Post subject:
there are know problems on v23 too with the ipw driver. especially with wpa2 _________________ "So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
Joined: 06 Jun 2006 Posts: 7463 Location: Dresden, Germany
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:32 Post subject:
just with the windows driver. linux runs fine _________________ "So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
I've personally noticed that the Intel wireless cards (in linux) have a terrible time associating with access points that have broadcast off and using wpa_supplicant. I usually have to turn broadcast back on in order to connect correctly. _________________ WPA2-RADIUS AP: DD-WRT v24 SP1 std on WRT54GS v2.1
Spare AP: DD-WRT v24 SP1 std on WRT54G v3
You MUST copy the .cer certificate from your CA to your linux machine in order for this to work. I'm not sure why, because the whole idea behind PEAP is that it doesn't require a client-side certificate, but that's what I had to do in order to make it work.
Other thought: requiring a cert and a password is almost like using EAP-FAST or EAP-TLS, but requiring a pw. _________________ WPA2-RADIUS AP: DD-WRT v24 SP1 std on WRT54GS v2.1
Spare AP: DD-WRT v24 SP1 std on WRT54G v3
I want that wpa_supplicant work on linksys as client station, not ap, with wpa-eap tls or peap auth.
Ahh, I see what you're saying - you'd like your Linksys AP to be a client of another AP that is using eap-tls or peap authentication, is that correct? _________________ WPA2-RADIUS AP: DD-WRT v24 SP1 std on WRT54GS v2.1
Spare AP: DD-WRT v24 SP1 std on WRT54G v3
BS, do you plan to support U.S. Robotic USR5461 through a micro version firmware? This router comes with a USB port (can attach a USB mass storage) and only 2/8MB Flash/RAM. I know some people are considering to acquire this router and then will mod with a larger Flash/RAM. If you have any interest to support this router, perhaps you can download the U.S. Robotic GPLed source code for this router as shown on this Table to see how to pack the code into a firmware. BTW, the original firmware doesn't support Telnet and/or SSH sessions. With DDWRT, I am sure these features will be part of the firmware.
Joined: 06 Jun 2006 Posts: 7463 Location: Dresden, Germany
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 18:20 Post subject:
i dont want to support any new 2 mb / 8 mb if i had to add special features. i have enough troubles with memory consumption without usb support _________________ "So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:03 Post subject: high cpu load
Hey I was using the 06-07-12 v24 beta on WRT54Gv1 hardware and updated with the 0716 build (dd-wrt.v24_wrt54g.bin) and the cpu usage on it was at 100% with a load of:
Time: 00:34:47 up 34 min, load average: 13.52, 11.52, 7.51
Which was the last update I saw on my browser before it wasn't able to auto-refresh any longer. So something between 0712 and 0716 brought the '100% cpu use on v1 hardware' bug back. Cheers!
PS: I downgraded to 0713, same bin image, and the problem exists with that version too.
Can someone point me to some details of the benefits that dual SSID's will provide? I'm currently running a second (Netgear) router to provide guest internet access while firewalling guest machines from the server and personal PC's on our network.
With v24, will I be able to ditch that second unit and treat the two SSIDs as separate WLANS with separate firewall rules? That would be excellent.