Cisco Valet M10 (ver1) test firmware

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Broadcom SoC based Hardware
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
Eko
DD-WRT Developer/Maintainer


Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 5771

PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:40    Post subject: Cisco Valet M10 (ver1) test firmware Reply with quote
Hi,
this should work on Valet M10 ver 1.

Don't flash to ver.2 - diff new chipset



dd-wrt.v24-15257_NEWD-2_K2.6_mini_m10.bin
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  dd-wrt.v24-15257_NEWD-2_K2.6_mini_m10.bin
 Filesize:  3.3 MB
 Downloaded:  8542 Time(s)

Sponsor
Clete2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 13:59    Post subject: Reply with quote
I worship you.

I'll try it out in the next few days.
LOM
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 28 Dec 2008
Posts: 7647

PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 14:02    Post subject: Reply with quote
Eeh? What's wrong with right now?

Downloaded 3 times so far - reports anyone ?

_________________
Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!


Last edited by LOM on Thu Sep 23, 2010 14:04; edited 1 time in total
Clete2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 14:04    Post subject: Reply with quote
LOM wrote:
Eeh? What's wrong with right now?


Not at home. Busy life. Smile
Clete2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 21:56    Post subject: Reply with quote
I must apologize. I don't think I'll be installing this firmware. I just flashed my old WRT160N V3 (I had trashed it due to stability problems) since I had nothing to lose. The installation went perfectly and I'm using that one for now and I will be returning the M10 to the store if all goes well.

If the router still has issues, I will be flashing the M10.
tweakmaster
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 3:21    Post subject: Reply with quote
Has anyone tested this yet?
fggs
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1741

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:04    Post subject: Reply with quote
No, otherwise would have a feedback here. Do you have this router? Why don't you be the pioneer? Wink
tweakmaster
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:07    Post subject: Reply with quote
Well I would love to but I'm a scared. I just bought it today to replace a WRT150n that died on me so I don't want to risk killing this one yet. Razz
Orbiting234
DD-WRT User


Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:16    Post subject: Reply with quote
Edit: It doesn't matter since nvram size is the same. 160N to M10 conversion unnecessary.

That being said, yes Eko, this build does flash to my M10 just fine. Smile


Last edited by Orbiting234 on Fri Sep 24, 2010 6:28; edited 3 times in total
Clete2
DD-WRT User


Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:26    Post subject: Reply with quote
Nice, but what good would it do (other than for testing purposes) to convert my WRT160Nv3 to a M10?
Orbiting234
DD-WRT User


Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:33    Post subject: Reply with quote
Edit: Well, I guess the only reason would be to use the Cisco Connect software really. Sounds like if you are going to run DD-WRT on it there is no reason to as I was incorrect in thinking the M10 had more nvram allocated than the 160Nv3.

Last edited by Orbiting234 on Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:49; edited 1 time in total
Dark_Shadow
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 2448
Location: Third Rock from the Sun

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:36    Post subject: Reply with quote
Orbiting234 wrote:
Only going to leave the files here for a few brave souls and then remove them.
Why would you remove them?
_________________
Peacock Thread-FAQ -- dd-wrt Wiki

Testing Multiple Routers -- Bootloader Collection Project -- My Wiki
Orbiting234
DD-WRT User


Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:44    Post subject: Reply with quote
Less chance of someone screwing theirs up lol.
LOM
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 28 Dec 2008
Posts: 7647

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:41    Post subject: Reply with quote
Orbiting234 wrote:
The M series is just like the E series afaik. In otherwords: larger nvram space compared to the identical hardware they replaced. That's why you see WRT610v2 users all putting the E3000 CFE on their routers, etc. Although I suppose once someone gets it on their M10 they can just rip the CFE and share for all.


I've just had the chance to check an E1000 cfe (thanks to barryware who bought a router only for making dd-wrt support possible).

There is no difference between an 160v3, an M10 or an E1000, it is only the E2000 and E3000 that has got the bigger nvram.

Yes, I know, the E1000 has a fancier case colour and the stock firmware may have some extra features (Easy WPS connect?) that the others don't have, but that is basically what differs between them.

_________________
Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
tweakmaster
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 19:25    Post subject: Reply with quote
Ok I really want to try this. If I brick my M10 will I be able to use tftp (or other method) to return to stock? Also I already updated the fw on it to the latest provided by Cisco. It's at version 2.0.01. Is that going to hinder me in anyway?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next Display posts from previous:    Page 1 of 10
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Broadcom SoC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum