Build 15407 released

Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
mrc_torres
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 40
Location: Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 10:47    Post subject: Build 15407 released Reply with quote
http://www.dd-wrt.com/site/support/other-downloads?path=others%2Feko%2FBrainSlayer-V24-preSP2%2F10-09-10-r15407%2F
Sponsor
geziukas
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 13 Jun 2010
Posts: 21
Location: Lithuania

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:38    Post subject: Reply with quote
WHR-G300N v2 wireless (N) droping speed from 150 to 65 Mbps after 18 min
gunny2k9
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:21    Post subject: Reply with quote
dam it lol only just put Build 15362 on last night Razz any ieads on the changes?
lordgreg
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 23 Feb 2008
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:38    Post subject: Reply with quote
geziukas wrote:
WHR-G300N v2 wireless (N) droping speed from 150 to 65 Mbps after 18 min


wow! a progress! but not in the way we wanted o_O

this is getting worse with every firmware Sad
geziukas
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 13 Jun 2010
Posts: 21
Location: Lithuania

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:45    Post subject: Reply with quote
discovered strange thing : when selected Regulatory Domain is Lithuania TX Power show 18dBm and user connect with speed : 150/135 rates and after some time drop to 65/65
Now tested : select United Stated and TX power show 12dBm and user connect with 150/150 rates and after 24 min not droping speed Smile
BrainSlayer
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 7492
Location: Dresden, Germany

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 13:01    Post subject: Reply with quote
lordgreg wrote:
geziukas wrote:
WHR-G300N v2 wireless (N) droping speed from 150 to 65 Mbps after 18 min


wow! a progress! but not in the way we wanted o_O

this is getting worse with every firmware Sad


even if nothing has been changed on this device within the wireless driver. not every problem you feel has its reason on the ap. sometimes client drivers are buggy too or not really 802.11n compliant. 65 mbit drop may also happen if you dont use your wireless. the tx / rx rate is calculated on best performance base. if wireless isnt used, it dropps down

_________________
"So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
meocene
DD-WRT User


Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Posts: 130

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 13:06    Post subject: Reply with quote
what is the most generous reg domain?

doesn't seam to matter which i select i can never get past 18dBm.

_________________
WZR-1750DHP r29607
BrainSlayer
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 7492
Location: Dresden, Germany

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 13:12    Post subject: Reply with quote
the hardware has its limits too. this should be considered. new zealand allows up to 30 dbm in 2.4 ghz, but that doesnt mean that your hardware does support such power levels
_________________
"So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
geziukas
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 13 Jun 2010
Posts: 21
Location: Lithuania

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 13:17    Post subject: Reply with quote
BrainSlayerI guess the main problem not wrong selected Regulatory Domain, but different TX Power. Now when it is 12 dBM wireless connection show 150/150 and not droping to 65/65. I tried when tx power was 18 speed changed to 65/65 and even wireless is active the speed don't change, when selected regional united state and dbm is 12 the speed when incantive change to 150/105 and when is active imeaditly change to 150/150. The problem I guess is solved
BrainSlayer
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Posts: 7492
Location: Dresden, Germany

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 13:26    Post subject: Reply with quote
usually the problem is the signal quality here. too strong signals might also have negative effects. especially for 802.11n, where alot of performance is made with multiple paths (reflections)
150 mbit simply says ht20 mode + 2 chains. it seems your switched back to single chain mode which disables the multiple path capabilities since the rate control driver had too much errors in 2 chain mode. usually this was caused by too high output gain.

_________________
"So you tried to use the computer and it started smoking? Sounds like a Mac to me.." - Louis Rossmann https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eL_5YDRWqGE&t=60s
geziukas
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 13 Jun 2010
Posts: 21
Location: Lithuania

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 13:29    Post subject: Reply with quote
Thanks for explanation.now I'm happy with whr-g300n v2 speed and performance
ksec
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 14:41    Post subject: Reply with quote
BrainSlayer wrote:
usually the problem is the signal quality here. too strong signals might also have negative effects. especially for 802.11n, where alot of performance is made with multiple paths (reflections)
150 mbit simply says ht20 mode + 2 chains. it seems your switched back to single chain mode which disables the multiple path capabilities since the rate control driver had too much errors in 2 chain mode. usually this was caused by too high output gain.


Arh. That is a question i need an answer from expert.

But First. I would like to bring your attention to this thread http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=74112&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=45 about Hardware version V7.1 of TP-LINK TL-WR841N, i am willing to sent / buy the money / hardware to you to get this supported.
Any chance of it being supported in the near future?

Now back to the question, you mention multiple paths (reflections), i had an argument about wireless signal rely on reflections, however someone told me i had no idea of physics and Wireless Network @ 2.4Ghz will go through most materials apart from concrete and metals, and therefore its best signal strength is always its Direct Path. My experience has told me otherwise.

Do wireless signal reflect on all materials? Not that it is 100% reflected, but surely some does get reflected right? And therefore best path is != to direct path? Right?[/i]
madiori
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 14 Aug 2010
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 16:39    Post subject: Reply with quote
swap function finally come into this build, thanks BrainSlayer.
however, still have the web gui crush issue when mount usb disk on the start up command.
and all others going well on G300NH so far.
Hope could fix this issue on next builds.
BTW,14929 have no this issue, and since 15xxx,all have this issue.

thanks
LOM
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 28 Dec 2008
Posts: 7647

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 17:41    Post subject: Reply with quote
madiori wrote:
swap function finally come into this build, thanks BrainSlayer.
however, still have the web gui crush issue when mount usb disk on the start up command.


Are you sure that the optware libraries that you are using and exporting pth to is compatible with the new kernel?
Test with a script that only mounts the disks.

_________________
Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
sco77
DD-WRT User


Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 20:27    Post subject: Reply with quote
Wireless latency seems to be lower and more stable, could just be due to current noise level at time of testing though.


I think all the USB mounting problems are fixed in this build (I dont use USB drives to test though).
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next Display posts from previous:    Page 1 of 3
Post new topic   Reply to topic    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Atheros WiSOC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum