Linksys Cisco E1200 Version 2 DD-WRT Supported

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Broadcom SoC based Hardware
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20
Author Message
tedm
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 13 Mar 2009
Posts: 555

PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 7:33    Post subject: Reply with quote
I did one of these with 33607 refer to the build thread for details.
Sponsor
jpp
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Tue Jan 02, 2018 17:58    Post subject: Reply with quote
I have been testing 33986 build (with Krack patch) for the last days on my secondary AP and so far so good.


Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r33986 mega (12/04/17)
Time: 15:54:21 up 2 days, 5:10, load average: 0.16, 0.13, 0.07

JP
Queiroz
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 28 Nov 2012
Posts: 32
Location: Guará - SP - Brazil

PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 13:47    Post subject: Reply with quote
Hey guys.

I bought one yesterday which should arrive shortly. Is it possible to use this as a repeater without lan cable connected? Thank you!

Ill install DDWRT as soon as it arrives.

Regards,
Queiroz
jwh7
DD-WRT Guru


Joined: 25 Oct 2013
Posts: 2670
Location: Indy

PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 19:16    Post subject: Reply with quote
Queiroz wrote:
Is it possible to use this as a repeater without lan cable connected?
Yes, or WDS if the primary router is also Broadcom (non-ARM). See the various modes here:
https://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Linking_Routers

And the wiki for the E1200v2: https://dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Linksys_E1200v2

_________________
# NAT/SFE/CTF: limited speed w/ DD # Repeater issues # DD-WRT info: FAQ, Builds, Types, Modes, Changes, Demo #
OPNsense x64 5050e ITX|DD: DIR-810L, 2*EA6900@1GHz, R6300v1, RT-N66U@663, WNDR4000@533, E1500@353,
WRT54G{Lv1.1,Sv6}@250
|FreshTomato: F7D8302@532|OpenWRT: F9K1119v1, RT-ACRH13, R6220, WNDR3700v4
no188
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 06 Jan 2018
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 8:50    Post subject: E1200 V2 on Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r29519 mega (04/25/16) Reply with quote
Hi guys,
I had recently converted my E1200 V2 into wireless bridge as per firmware above following the guide on this link.
https://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Wireless_Bridge
I had followed all the steps except I had turned on SPI firewall as I need to allow multicast enabled checked.
So far i had no issue with the repeater, but the rate reported on the status page is only around 54-65MbPS (I had used NG mixed)
and some error reported on the RX.
Of course, there is another issue where i cannot used my LAN port, where the client connected are actually assigned an 169.XX IP. I had read through this page
https://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Linksys_E1500#Recovering_from_Management_Mode_Firmware_Recovery_or_No_ethernet_connection
which i guess it is a potential fixed for my problem. However, i just loafing this thread and found this topic and realized that there is a very latest build (3XXXX) which I can see somebody had tried it.
Here's some question of mine
1) What is the latest supported DD-WRT firmware for this device (E1200 V2)
2) What is the update procedure the latest supported firmware in (1) ?
Appreciate guys
no188
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 06 Jan 2018
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:05    Post subject: Reply with quote
***UPDATE***
I had flashed my E1200 to Build 33555 and mysteriously, the wired LAN issue solved.
So far had been running 2 days with this version and seems no issue.
ProudNoob
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 14 Jan 2018
Posts: 2
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:06    Post subject: Reply with quote
jpp wrote:
I have been testing 33986 build (with Krack patch) for the last days on my secondary AP and so far so good.


Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r33986 mega (12/04/17)
Time: 15:54:21 up 2 days, 5:10, load average: 0.16, 0.13, 0.07

JP


Based on jpp's comment, I decided to put this same build (dd-wrt.v24-33986_NEWD-2_K3.x_mega-nv64k.bin) on my Cisco/Linksys E1200 v2 as my very first foray into DD-WRT. I followed the Flashing Instructions including the Current Editor's Note, which took me from the Linksys firmware it came with to DD-WRT build 33555 mega, and then I flashed to 33986 from there.

On my fairly vanilla configuration I have 2 full days of uptime, 16,000MB of ingress, and 800MB of egress behind me. I'm using the default settings aside from changing the root password, renaming the SSID, enabling WPA2 Personal wireless security, and pointing DNS at DNS.WATCH's resolvers. An hour ago I also enabled the OpenVPN client, and it has been solid aside from the significantly reduced ingress capability of about 3Mbps (which at a glance appears to be bottlenecked at the router CPU, although I have not yet attempted to diagnose and could be a result of many factors external to the router).

The only two issues I have observed are trivial:
1. After applying Restore Factory Defaults, it is necessary to power cycle the router in order to bring it back to life. During the process of flashing from the original Linksys firmware to DD-WRT, I also observed this behavior on at least one of the older builds along the way. I've seen it mentioned in this Forum several times, so it is a known nuance.
2. Enabling HTTPS web access to the DD-WRT Control Panel does not appear to work. I'm not exposing the Control Panel to the outside, so https is not absolutely necessary for me, this is just something I noticed.

I am just writing this to share my experience with DD-WRT 33986 on the Linksys E1200 v2 router, and to thank jpp for sharing his experience with this build - I am not writing to ask for help at this time. I wanted to try configuring OpenVPN on a router current enough to have vulnerabilities like KRACK addressed, which lead me to DD-WRT. Perhaps the above will be useful to someone with similar thoughts.
jpp
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Tue Jan 16, 2018 17:38    Post subject: Reply with quote
Thanks, produnoob.

I have migrated both my routers to DD-WRT v3.0-r33986 mega (12/04/17) as well, and they seem to work fine.

The issues you mentioned - as you noticed - are know. I do not use OpenVPN, but i have seen problems mentioned on some threads.

JP
jpp
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 12:49    Post subject: Reply with quote
I am using : DD-WRT v3.0-r34929 mega 02/12/18 on two e1200v2 and i am getting a few errors on the logs related to igmp:

user.warn igmpproxy[1585]: MRT_DEL_MFC; Errno(2): No such file or directory
user.warn igmpproxy[1585]: No interfaces found for source 0.0.0.0
igmpproxy[2306]: select() failure; Errno(4): Interrupted system call

Any thoughts?

My HP printer has some connectivity problems with the same router and i read that printer uses multicast / bonjour / mdns settings to work.

Could this be the root cause?

JP
jpp
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 26 Sep 2017
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2018 4:08    Post subject: Reply with quote
There is a new firmware available from Linksys ( version 2.0.10) from 14/aug/18.

https://www.linksys.com/gr/support-article?articleNum=148523

Release notes point to security vulnerabilities, perhaps (??) related to this problem: https://forum.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=315234&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

Release notes: http://downloads.linksys.com/downloads/releasenotes/E1200_2.0.10.001_FwReleaseNotes.txt

Anyone installed it yet? I will only be able to do it in about 10 days.

JP
konker
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 29 Sep 2017
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2018 13:07    Post subject: K2.6 mini support for JFFS2 Reply with quote
This might be a little off topic so let me know if I need to start a new thread.
I'm trying to install Shadowsocks on my Linksys E1200 v.2 router using DD-WRT but all the mega builds do not have JFFS2 support nor does it leave enough space for JFFS2 to be incorporated after installing Entware. According to this list, I would need to install the K.2.6 mini build to obtain JFFS2 support and it is currently available for download for this router.
Should I flash this factory flash firmware over my current DD-WRT firmware and use it as is?
konker
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 29 Sep 2017
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Tue Oct 09, 2018 16:16    Post subject: Re: K2.6 mini support for JFFS2 Reply with quote
konker wrote:
This might be a little off topic so let me know if I need to start a new thread.
I'm trying to install Shadowsocks on my Linksys E1200 v.2 router using DD-WRT but all the mega builds do not have JFFS2 support nor does it leave enough space for JFFS2 to be incorporated after installing Entware. According to this list, I would need to install the K.2.6 mini build to obtain JFFS2 support and it is currently available for download for this router.
Should I flash this factory flash firmware over my current DD-WRT firmware and use it as is?

Okay, I found out I was wrong. The mega and big builds do have JFFS2 support in the K2.6 firmware. But whatever I tried to flash that version over the current Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r36698 mega (08/22/1Cool does not seem to work. I also discovered that the v3.0 firmware has JFFS2 support but no matter what I did, I could not mount the jffs partition. Any ideas?
crymore13
DD-WRT Novice


Joined: 18 Sep 2018
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2018 21:17    Post subject: Reply with quote
I'm using the Firmware: DD-WRT v3.0-r37405 mega (10/16/1Cool
I have 60mb/6mb
When I'm playing, my ping keep spiking too much...
I did a ping 192.168.1.1 and I saw this:
Code:
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=116ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=11ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=39ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=12ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=13ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=49ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=13ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=11ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=124ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo<1ms TTL=64
Resposta de 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 tempo=8ms TTL=64

Estatísticas do Ping para 192.168.1.1:
    Pacotes: Enviados = 3764, Recebidos = 3759, Perdidos = 5 (0% de
             perda),
Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos:
    Mínimo = 0ms, Máximo = 409ms, Média = 6ms


Change firmware can fix this?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20 Display posts from previous:    Page 20 of 20
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    DD-WRT Forum Index -> Broadcom SoC based Hardware All times are GMT

Navigation

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum