<kong>,
As soon as I create a VAP (bridged) on the repeater bridge AC68 with 26365M, clients connected to the repeater bridge will have limited internet access with an IP address of 169.xxx.xxx.xxx.
The purpose to create a VAP (with different SSID) on the bridge is to work-around the repeater bridge does not broadcast the repeated SSID.
Thanks.
--stoney
Last edited by stoney li on Sat Feb 28, 2015 23:16; edited 1 time in total
As far as I can tell from the last days of usage and testing, the drivers are working absolutely flawless now.
I tested all wireless modes + performance in the last few days and it has never been better.
Hi Kong, first of all Thank You again for all your amazing work.
I was just wondering if there is any plan (or update in regards to) to add/incorporate CTF Hardware NAT functionality to the firmware now that the things are much more stable especially with the new driver? Hoping so...
E-Ma,
a couple of weeks ago Kong mentioned that if/when he got time he might look at CTF (ddtb) again.
That was the last I think he has publicly stated on the topic. _________________ Router currently owned:
Netgear R7800 - Router
Netgear R7000 - AP mode
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2015 22:01 Post subject: Repeater bridge not working
Upgraded my Netgear R6250 to 26365M. Did a full reset (nvram erase). Repeater bridge no longer works for me. I see TX and RX as NA on the status page. Clients are not able to connect. This used to work in 26285M.
E-Ma,
a couple of weeks ago Kong mentioned that if/when he got time he might look at CTF (ddtb) again.
That was the last I think he has publicly stated on the topic.
Hi Mike thanks for trying but if you can please reread my post, I was asking something different - I was asking if there is an update to this now that things are stable. Only Kong would know the answer unless he has communicated something to you that we are not aware of. Let's see what he says.
E-Ma,
a couple of weeks ago Kong mentioned that if/when he got time he might look at CTF (ddtb) again.
That was the last I think he has publicly stated on the topic.
Hi Mike thanks for trying but if you can please reread my post, I was asking something different - I was asking if there is an update to this now that things are stable. Only Kong would know the answer unless he has communicated something to you that we are not aware of. Let's see what he says.
BS 26372 vap stops working (maybe the dhcp not working for me?)
but kong (SVN revision 26365M) makes it work?
If 26365 made made it work (i know it broke sometimes after BS 26138 how did it stop in 26372?
a bit confused because I thought this was fixed already.
Do we need to do the dnsmasq for VAPs differently now?
The router is in AP mode with "dhcp server" off and just using dnsmasq options to set it for guest APs and normal APs no dhcp or nat. MUltple dhcp also set although it's I guess not being used.
again dunno if it's me but the deny internet in "access restrictions" also does not work. I added my tablet to the list send it to deny everyday and I can still get to any website but not google.
again dunno if it's me but the deny internet in "access restrictions" also does not work. I added my tablet to the list send it to deny everyday and I can still get to any website but not google.
E-Man ultimately observed/concluded that Privoxy does not play nice with access restrictions (around about page 2 of that thread). _________________ reenignE esreveR
Resistance is NOT futile... It's Voltage divided by Current!
Assumptions:
1. Everyone on the forum has read the relevant forum section announcements.
2. For Broadcom section we have ALL at least tried to understand the "Peacock" thread,HERE
again dunno if it's me but the deny internet in "access restrictions" also does not work. I added my tablet to the list send it to deny everyday and I can still get to any website but not google.
again dunno if it's me but the deny internet in "access restrictions" also does not work. I added my tablet to the list send it to deny everyday and I can still get to any website but not google.
E-Man ultimately observed/concluded that Privoxy does not play nice with access restrictions (around about page 2 of that thread).
also just FYI... you could use custom privoxy user.actions to black list sites, or OpenDNS content filtering see my last two posts THERE for details _________________ reenignE esreveR
Resistance is NOT futile... It's Voltage divided by Current!
Assumptions:
1. Everyone on the forum has read the relevant forum section announcements.
2. For Broadcom section we have ALL at least tried to understand the "Peacock" thread,HERE
again dunno if it's me but the deny internet in "access restrictions" also does not work. I added my tablet to the list send it to deny everyday and I can still get to any website but not google.
Joined: 28 Aug 2014 Posts: 135 Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2015 19:39 Post subject:
Quick question, has anyone gotten IPv6 to work using 6in4 with Hurricane Electric on Kong 26365? I am trying to set it up for the first time and I don't know if this build is giving me trouble or if its my ISP.
Just thought I'd ask before I go digging deeper into this.
