Router Model Netgear R7800
Firmware Version DD-WRT v3.0-r34310M kongat (12/30/17)
Kernel VersionLinux 4.14.9 #5 SMP Sat Dec 30 00:33:45 CET 2017 armv7l
R7800 works now without reset, no hangs.
One things I found is the clock speed doesn't go lower than 800mhz on both cores. I mean without load obviousyl.
Router Model Netgear R7800
Firmware Version DD-WRT v3.0-r34310M kongat (12/30/17)
Kernel VersionLinux 4.14.9 #5 SMP Sat Dec 30 00:33:45 CET 2017 armv7l
R7800 works now without reset, no hangs.
One things I found is the clock speed doesn't go lower than 800mhz on both cores. I mean without load obviousyl.
glad to see yet another user with latency issues, more of us the better. cause im not being believed right now. going on 8+ years fighting for qos in this firmware.. _________________ LATEST FIRMWARE(S)
BrainSlayer wrote:
we just do it since we do not like any restrictions enforced by stupid cocaine snorting managers
Just saw a discussion about this over on the LEDE forum for the R7800:
dissent wrote:
Quote:
What about irqbalance in this situation? It is not useful?
I wouldn’t suggest using irqbalance ever as it messes with interrupts and increases cache misses drastically to the level that you don’t have improved throughput at all or even face a degradation
Well of course it "messes" with interrupts, the whole point of it is to spread interrupts across available CPUs.
The trade-off is that your caches may not be as hot, but none of your CPUs are getting overloaded with interrupts. It really depends on how much load is being generated by interrupts.
In this case it may hurt performance, but in general irqbalance can be very helpful for performance.